Funny how there’s always fast-paced change

Recently I’ve been reading Make ‘Em Laugh: The Funny Business of America, by Laurence Maslon and Michael Kantor.

An entertaining, anecdotal overview of twentieth century American comedy, the book got me comparing the rate of past change in the entertainment industry with more recent developments in e-communications and marketing.

Sure, today we can construct a timeline of recent innovation where the dates are more closely spaced, but the prior century was marked by more dramatic changes in the entertainment industry that left stars in one medium out in the cold despite their best efforts to keep up with the times.

Recently we’ve seen a startling pace of innovation, what with blogs, social networking, ezines, YouTube, easy-to-post photos and audios, smart phones, Kindle, instant messaging and more.

In comparison, the first years of the last century saw vaudeville storming America. Silent movies took off until the first talkie (1927’s The Jazz Singer) made earlier films seem dated. Then came radio, with many of the most popular vaudevillians taking to this medium in the early 1930s. Television came along in the late ‘40s.

The biographies of the leading names of the era show them adapting repeatedly to explosive change. George Burns and Gracie Allen first appeared together in vaudeville in 1923, and movie shorts soon followed. Then on to radio in 1932 and television in 1949, with their own TV show in 1950.

Jack Benny’s career followed a similar pattern. The vaudeville circuit for two decades, radio in 1932, TV in 1948, his own show in 1950.

And so went the stories of Bob Hope, Milton Berle, Edgar Bergen, Groucho Marx and others. Exceedingly successful in every medium they attempted.

Then there was Fred Allen. Allen (a rarely heard name today but very famous in his day) played vaudeville for years and then Broadway comic revues. He also was introduced to radio audiences in 1932 and hosted seven shows. But he proved a disaster on TV, mounting a variety of shows, each failing, before his death in 1956.

Call it profound observation or sour grapes when Allen pointed out how radio was intellectually superior to TV:

The trouble with television is, it’s too graphic. In radio, even a moron could visualize things his way; an intelligent man, his way. It was a custom-made suit. Television is a ready-made suit. Everyone has to wear the same one. Everything is for the eye these days: Life, Look, the picture business. Nothing is for the mind. The next generation will have eyeballs as big as cantaloupes and no brains at all.

Accusations that lower-quality but newer media are dumbing down the population continue today but interestingly, we look back further in time for the superior formats as e-media and even film are blamed for impairing imagination relative to the traditional book.

The more things change, the further back we look for the “better” predecessor. But change itself is nothing new. Change is the only constant.


2 responses to “Funny how there’s always fast-paced change

  1. It does seem things are changing at a whirlwind pace. I often wonder if the blogging and texting so much is a positive or a negative. I never know when I read something online if it’s verifiable facts or some one writing because they can. I prefer facts.

    I am in the “elder generation”, often wish for calmer days. But I have never wished for the good old days. I like having a computer, TV, good cars, etc. (and indoor bathrooms with soft toilet paper)

  2. There will always be people who resist change and others who cling to the past rather than embrace the future. Change has always progressed at a faster and faster rate too. The older you are, the easier it is to tell yourself you can’t keep up or it’s not relevant to you… and many times it isn’t relevant to everyone. Fred Allen did have a valid point about radio though, witness the popularity of “The Prairie Home Companion ” on NPR.
    Dramatic events help spur dramatic changes. The Great Depression spurred rapid urbanization, Prohibition repeal, a resurgence of Labor Unions, a “Stimulas package” in the form of public projects like the CCC and NWA, not to mention it’s effect on escapist activities such as radio and movies.
    I just hope the current recession spurs as many positive changes. No doubt about it, change WILL come. It’s up to us whether we embrace it and use it wisely, or ignore those changes and become as useful as an anvil. Anvils are still being used…. but by less than .001% of the population!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s